| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 19:21:54 -0700
From: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
"Cc: Android Kernel" <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...el.com>,
"moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
kvmarm <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_alloc_private_va_range()
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 11:52 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 08 Apr 2022 21:03:24 +0100,
> Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > hyp_alloc_private_va_range() can be used to reserve private VA ranges
> > in the nVHE hypervisor. Allocations are aligned based on the order of
> > the requested size.
> >
> > This will be used to implement stack guard pages for KVM nVHE hypervisor
> > (nVHE Hyp mode / not pKVM), in a subsequent patch in the series.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>
> > Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in v7:
> > - Add Fuad's Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags.
> >
> > Changes in v6:
> > - Update kernel-doc for hyp_alloc_private_va_range()
> > and add return description, per Stephen
> > - Update hyp_alloc_private_va_range() to return an int error code,
> > per Stephen
> > - Replace IS_ERR() checks with IS_ERR_VALUE() check, per Stephen
> > - Clean up goto, per Stephen
> >
> > Changes in v5:
> > - Align private allocations based on the order of their size, per Marc
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Handle null ptr in hyp_alloc_private_va_range() and replace
> > IS_ERR_OR_NULL checks in callers with IS_ERR checks, per Fuad
> > - Fix kernel-doc comments format, per Fuad
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Handle null ptr in IS_ERR_OR_NULL checks, per Mark
> >
> >
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h | 1 +
> > arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > index 74735a864eee..a50cbb5ba402 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
> > @@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __kern_hyp_va(unsigned long v)
> > int kvm_share_hyp(void *from, void *to);
> > void kvm_unshare_hyp(void *from, void *to);
> > int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot);
> > +int hyp_alloc_private_va_range(size_t size, unsigned long *haddr);
> > int create_hyp_io_mappings(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > void __iomem **kaddr,
> > void __iomem **haddr);
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > index 0d19259454d8..3d3efea4e991 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> > @@ -457,23 +457,22 @@ int create_hyp_mappings(void *from, void *to, enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > -static int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > - unsigned long *haddr,
> > - enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * hyp_alloc_private_va_range - Allocates a private VA range.
> > + * @size: The size of the VA range to reserve.
> > + * @haddr: The hypervisor virtual start address of the allocation.
> > + *
> > + * The private virtual address (VA) range is allocated below io_map_base
> > + * and aligned based on the order of @size.
> > + *
> > + * Return: 0 on success or negative error code on failure.
> > + */
> > +int hyp_alloc_private_va_range(size_t size, unsigned long *haddr)
> > {
> > unsigned long base;
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > - if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> > - base = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_create_private_mapping,
> > - phys_addr, size, prot);
> > - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL((void *)base))
> > - return PTR_ERR((void *)base);
> > - *haddr = base;
> > -
> > - return 0;
> > - }
> > -
> > mutex_lock(&kvm_hyp_pgd_mutex);
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -484,30 +483,53 @@ static int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > *
> > * The allocated size is always a multiple of PAGE_SIZE.
> > */
> > - size = PAGE_ALIGN(size + offset_in_page(phys_addr));
> > - base = io_map_base - size;
> > + base = io_map_base - PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> > +
> > + /* Align the allocation based on the order of its size */
> > + base = ALIGN_DOWN(base, PAGE_SIZE << get_order(size));
> >
> > /*
> > * Verify that BIT(VA_BITS - 1) hasn't been flipped by
> > * allocating the new area, as it would indicate we've
> > * overflowed the idmap/IO address range.
> > */
> > - if ((base ^ io_map_base) & BIT(VA_BITS - 1))
> > + if (!base || (base ^ io_map_base) & BIT(VA_BITS - 1))
>
> I don't get this '!base' check. Why isn't it encompassed by the
> 'VA_BITS - 1' flip check?
Hi Marc, You're right. The flip check handles this as well. I’ll drop
in the next version.
>
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > else
> > - io_map_base = base;
> > + *haddr = io_map_base = base;
> >
> > mutex_unlock(&kvm_hyp_pgd_mutex);
> >
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __create_hyp_private_mapping(phys_addr_t phys_addr, size_t size,
> > + unsigned long *haddr,
> > + enum kvm_pgtable_prot prot)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long addr;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!kvm_host_owns_hyp_mappings()) {
> > + addr = kvm_call_hyp_nvhe(__pkvm_create_private_mapping,
> > + phys_addr, size, prot);
> > + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(addr))
> > + return addr;
> > + *haddr = addr;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + size += offset_in_page(phys_addr);
>
> This hardly makes any sense on its own. I get it that it is still
> doing the right thing as hyp_alloc_private_va_range() will fix it up,
> but I'd rather you keep the PAGE_ALIGN() here, even if it ends up
> being duplicated.
Ack
Thanks,
Kalesh
>
> > + ret = hyp_alloc_private_va_range(size, &addr);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto out;
> > + return ret;
> >
> > - ret = __create_hyp_mappings(base, size, phys_addr, prot);
> > + ret = __create_hyp_mappings(addr, size, phys_addr, prot);
> > if (ret)
> > - goto out;
> > + return ret;
> >
> > - *haddr = base + offset_in_page(phys_addr);
> > -out:
> > + *haddr = addr + offset_in_page(phys_addr);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists