[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220418210352.1d1d90aeba477d598bd6f0be@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 21:03:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com>
Cc: <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, <david@...hat.com>,
<yaozhenguo1@...il.com>, <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
<songmuchun@...edance.com>, <liuyuntao10@...wei.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>, <dave@...olabs.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hugetlb: Fix wrong use of nr_online_nodes
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 10:35:26 +0000 Peng Liu <liupeng256@...wei.com> wrote:
> Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. In
> this case, nr_online_nodes can not be used to walk through numa node.
> Also, a valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes.
>
> However, in hugetlb, it is assumed that nodes are contiguous. Recheck
> all the places that use nr_online_nodes, and repair them one by one.
oops.
What are the user-visible runtime effects of this flaw?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists