[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220419074513.bgqmi3c5ydogpytj@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:45:13 +0100
From: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Casper Andersson <casper.casan@...il.com>,
Bjarni Jonasson <bjarni.jonasson@...rochip.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...el.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Xu Wang <vulab@...as.ac.cn>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 14/18] sfc: Remove usage of list iterator for
list_add() after the loop body
On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 02:29:43PM +0200, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> In preparation to limit the scope of a list iterator to the list
> traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer pointing to the location
> where the element should be inserted [1].
>
> Before, the code implicitly used the head when no element was found
> when using &new->list. The new 'pos' variable is set to the list head
> by default and overwritten if the list exits early, marking the
> insertion point for list_add().
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c
> index 1b22c7be0088..716847ba7038 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/rx_common.c
> @@ -556,6 +556,7 @@ efx_rx_packet_gro(struct efx_channel *channel, struct efx_rx_buffer *rx_buf,
> struct efx_rss_context *efx_alloc_rss_context_entry(struct efx_nic *efx)
> {
> struct list_head *head = &efx->rss_context.list;
> + struct list_head *pos = head;
This violates the reverse Xmas list policy. This definition should be
1 line further down.
Martin
> struct efx_rss_context *ctx, *new;
> u32 id = 1; /* Don't use zero, that refers to the master RSS context */
>
> @@ -563,8 +564,10 @@ struct efx_rss_context *efx_alloc_rss_context_entry(struct efx_nic *efx)
>
> /* Search for first gap in the numbering */
> list_for_each_entry(ctx, head, list) {
> - if (ctx->user_id != id)
> + if (ctx->user_id != id) {
> + pos = &ctx->list;
> break;
> + }
> id++;
> /* Check for wrap. If this happens, we have nearly 2^32
> * allocated RSS contexts, which seems unlikely.
> @@ -582,7 +585,7 @@ struct efx_rss_context *efx_alloc_rss_context_entry(struct efx_nic *efx)
>
> /* Insert the new entry into the gap */
> new->user_id = id;
> - list_add_tail(&new->list, &ctx->list);
> + list_add_tail(&new->list, pos);
> return new;
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists