[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9465da05497746b3b70d7c841a585d5b@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 08:07:50 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Alexander Lobakin' <alobakin@...me>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"Alexander Shishkin" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@...nel.org>,
Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
"Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
"Nick Desaulniers" <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Dmitrii Dolgov <9erthalion6@...il.com>,
Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>,
Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
"Chenbo Feng" <fengc@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"llvm@...ts.linux.dev" <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [PATCH bpf-next 07/11] samples: bpf: fix uin64_t format literals
From: Alexander Lobakin
> Sent: 16 April 2022 18:55
> To: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
>
> From: Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:52:13 -0700
>
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me> wrote:
> > >
> > > There's a couple places where uin64_t is being passed as an %ld
> > > format argument, which is incorrect (should be %lld). Fix them.
> >
> > This will cause some warning on some 64-bit compiler, no?
>
> Oh wait, I accidentially mentioned %ld and %lld although in fact I
> changed %lu to %llu. So there won't be any compiler warnings. I'll
> fix the commit message in v2.
That won't make any difference.
The correct way to print uint64_t is using PRIu64.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists