[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220419110445.2574424-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:04:45 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: kvalo@...nel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] wlcore: sdio: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get() to replace pm_runtime_get_sync and
pm_runtime_put_noidle. This change is just to simplify the code, no
actual functional changes.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
index 72fc41ac83c0..7b4e8cc36b49 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c
@@ -132,9 +132,8 @@ static int wl12xx_sdio_power_on(struct wl12xx_sdio_glue *glue)
struct sdio_func *func = dev_to_sdio_func(glue->dev);
struct mmc_card *card = func->card;
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&card->dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&card->dev);
if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(&card->dev);
dev_err(glue->dev, "%s: failed to get_sync(%d)\n",
__func__, ret);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists