lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Apr 2022 19:09:57 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse: sparse:
 incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   b2d229d4ddb17db541098b83524d901257e93845
commit: 28e77cc1c0686621a4d416f599cee5ab369daa0a fortify: Detect struct member overflows in memset() at compile-time
date:   9 weeks ago
config: arm64-randconfig-s031-20220419 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220419/202204191912.n9Krwsln-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # apt-get install sparse
        # sparse version: v0.6.4-dirty
        # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=28e77cc1c0686621a4d416f599cee5ab369daa0a
        git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
        git fetch --no-tags linus master
        git checkout 28e77cc1c0686621a4d416f599cee5ab369daa0a
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash arch/arm64/kernel/ drivers/remoteproc/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>


sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     expected void const *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
>> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     expected void const *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     expected void *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     expected void const *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     expected void const *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     expected void *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr

vim +437 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c

6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  378  
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  379  /*
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  380   * The R5F cores have controls for both a reset and a halt/run. The code
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  381   * execution from DDR requires the initial boot-strapping code to be run
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  382   * from the internal TCMs. This function is used to release the resets on
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  383   * applicable cores to allow loading into the TCMs. The .prepare() ops is
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  384   * invoked by remoteproc core before any firmware loading, and is followed
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  385   * by the .start() ops after loading to actually let the R5 cores run.
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  386   *
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  387   * The Single-CPU mode on applicable SoCs (eg: AM64x) only uses Core0 to
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  388   * execute code, but combines the TCMs from both cores. The resets for both
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  389   * cores need to be released to make this possible, as the TCMs are in general
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  390   * private to each core. Only Core0 needs to be unhalted for running the
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  391   * cluster in this mode. The function uses the same reset logic as LockStep
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  392   * mode for this (though the behavior is agnostic of the reset release order).
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  393   */
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  394  static int k3_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  395  {
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  396  	struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  397  	struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  398  	struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  399  	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  400  	u32 ctrl = 0, cfg = 0, stat = 0;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  401  	u64 boot_vec = 0;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  402  	bool mem_init_dis;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  403  	int ret;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  404  
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  405  	ret = ti_sci_proc_get_status(core->tsp, &boot_vec, &cfg, &ctrl, &stat);
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  406  	if (ret < 0)
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  407  		return ret;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  408  	mem_init_dis = !!(cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_MEM_INIT_DIS);
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  409  
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  410  	/* Re-use LockStep-mode reset logic for Single-CPU mode */
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  411  	ret = (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP ||
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  412  	       cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) ?
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  413  		k3_r5_lockstep_release(cluster) : k3_r5_split_release(core);
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  414  	if (ret) {
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  415  		dev_err(dev, "unable to enable cores for TCM loading, ret = %d\n",
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  416  			ret);
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  417  		return ret;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  418  	}
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  419  
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  420  	/*
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  421  	 * Newer IP revisions like on J7200 SoCs support h/w auto-initialization
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  422  	 * of TCMs, so there is no need to perform the s/w memzero. This bit is
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  423  	 * configurable through System Firmware, the default value does perform
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  424  	 * auto-init, but account for it in case it is disabled
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  425  	 */
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  426  	if (cluster->soc_data->tcm_ecc_autoinit && !mem_init_dis) {
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  427  		dev_dbg(dev, "leveraging h/w init for TCM memories\n");
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  428  		return 0;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  429  	}
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  430  
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  431  	/*
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  432  	 * Zero out both TCMs unconditionally (access from v8 Arm core is not
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  433  	 * affected by ATCM & BTCM enable configuration values) so that ECC
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  434  	 * can be effective on all TCM addresses.
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  435  	 */
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  436  	dev_dbg(dev, "zeroing out ATCM memory\n");
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02 @437  	memset(core->mem[0].cpu_addr, 0x00, core->mem[0].size);
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  438  
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  439  	dev_dbg(dev, "zeroing out BTCM memory\n");
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  440  	memset(core->mem[1].cpu_addr, 0x00, core->mem[1].size);
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  441  
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  442  	return 0;
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  443  }
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  444  

:::::: The code at line 437 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 34f2653686fecc9bd5a4ee16724768c72953fb57 remoteproc: k3-r5: Initialize TCM memories for ECC

:::::: TO: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
:::::: CC: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ