[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <694c2318d98973ee8995e891f81216ad267341dc.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:33:21 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, arnd@...db.de
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-um@...ts.infradead.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/11] um: use fallback for random_get_entropy()
instead of zero
On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 13:16 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> In the event that random_get_entropy() can't access a cycle counter or
> similar, falling back to returning 0 is really not the best we can do.
> Instead, at least calling random_get_entropy_fallback() would be
> preferable, because that always needs to return _something_, even
> falling back to jiffies eventually. It's not as though
> random_get_entropy_fallback() is super high precision or guaranteed to
> be entropic, but basically anything that's not zero all the time is
> better than returning zero all the time.
>
> This is accomplished by just including the asm-generic code like on
> other architectures, which means we can get rid of the empty stub
> function here.
LGTM, actually better than before, though not even sure any drivers in
ARCH=um have interrupts that say they can be used for this.
Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
I assume you're going to take this through the random tree?
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists