[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220419115737.GU2731@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2022 13:57:37 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andrew Cooper <Andrew.Cooper3@...rix.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/25] x86/xen: Add ANNOTATE_ENDBR to startup_xen()
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:42:12AM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 18/04/2022 17:50, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > The startup_xen() kernel entry point is referenced by the ".note.Xen"
> > section, but is presumably not indirect-branched to.
>
> It's the real entrypoint of the VM. It's "got to" by setting %rip
> during vcpu setup.
>
> We could in principle support starting a PV VM with CET active, but that
> sounds like an enormous quantity of effort for very little gain. CET
> for Xen PV requires paravirt anyway (because the kernel runs in CPL!=0)
> so decisions like this can wait until someone feels like doing the work.
>
> > Add ANNOTATE_ENDBR
> > to silence future objtool warnings.
> >
> > Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
> > Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
> > Cc: xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
>
> FWIW, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, preferably
> with the commit message tweaked to remove the uncertainty.
Something like so then?
---
Subject: x86/xen: Add ANNOTATE_ENDBR to startup_xen()
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 09:50:25 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
The startup_xen() kernel entry point is referenced by the ".note.Xen"
section, and is the real entry point of the VM. It *will* be
indirectly branched to, *however* currently Xen doesn't support PV VM
with CET active.
Add ANNOTATE_ENDBR to silence future objtool warnings.
Fixes: ed53a0d97192 ("x86/alternative: Use .ibt_endbr_seal to seal indirect calls")
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a87bd48b06d11ec4b98122a429e71e489b4e48c3.1650300597.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists