[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whqzkoYZ06Bn0Owy-tQt_jK1uSTFd6awUQAAGK4rysD1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 17:24:13 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
yukuai3@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fs-writeback: writeback_sb_inodes:Recalculate 'wrote' according skipped pages
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 3:20 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> Here's the thread:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/1295659049-2688-6-git-send-email-jaxboe@fusionio.com/
>
> I'll dig through it in a bit, but here's your reasoning for why it
> should not flush on preemption:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/BANLkTikBEJa7bJJoLFU7NoiEgOjVHVG08A@mail.gmail.com/
Well, that one was triggered by that whole "now it can happen
anywhere" worry that people had.
So yes, IO patterns are a worry, but I think the bigger worry - even
back then - was that preemption points can be pretty much anywhere in
the code.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists