linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] rcu: ftrace: avoid tracing a few functions executed in multi_cpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:26:33 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     patrick wang <patrick.wang.shcn@...il.com>
Cc:     paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org, quic_neeraju@...cinc.com,
        josh@...htriplett.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: ftrace: avoid tracing a few functions executed in
 multi_cpu_stop()

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:44:54 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> [*] You really should come up with a better way than stop machine, because
> the stop machine method is really disruptive, can you not use the break
> point method for updates?

Talk about dejavu!

  https://lore.kernel.org/all/mhng-62c2ef00-fb64-48c3-a2bb-43b2799161bf@palmer-ri-x1c9/

-- Steve