[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8ac9fab-85af-8f3c-eb68-c2d4d2f7f046@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 18:46:43 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
robh+dt@...nel.org, vkoul@...nel.org,
yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_srivasam@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] soundwire: qcom: add runtime pm support
On 20/04/2022 18:39, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> @@ -1197,12 +1224,23 @@ static int qcom_swrm_get_port_config(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl)
>> static int swrm_reg_show(struct seq_file *s_file, void *data)
>> {
>> struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *swrm = s_file->private;
>> - int reg, reg_val;
>> + int reg, reg_val, ret;
>> +
>> + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(swrm->dev);
>> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES) {
>> + dev_err_ratelimited(swrm->dev,
>> + "pm_runtime_get_sync failed in %s, ret %d\n",
>> + __func__, ret);
>> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(swrm->dev);
> ... here it's missing?
>
> I have a fix ready but thought I would check first if this was intentional
Its not intentional.
>
> https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/3602/commits/6353eec8dc971c5f0fda0166ae1777f71784ea32
Fix looks good.
--srini
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists