lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmBM8KEZ9JttevxH@google.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:12:00 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: use flush command instead of FUA for zoned device

On 04/19, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 02:57:03PM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > The block layer for zoned disk can reorder the FUA'ed IOs. Let's use flush
> > command to keep the write order.
> 
> The block layer can reorder all commands.  Given that FUA only affects
> the command itself that should not matter.  What is this trying to fix?

Not for zoned disk, as I mentioned. The mq-deadline serializes write commands
but I got an reordered command, if there's a FUA|PREFLUSH command, which emits
EIO by the disk.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ