[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220420195425.34911-2-logang@deltatee.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 13:54:14 -0600
From: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@...eticom.com>,
David Sloan <David.Sloan@...eticom.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: [PATCH v2 01/12] md/raid5: Factor out ahead_of_reshape() function
There are a few uses of an ugly ternary operator in raid5_make_request()
to check if a sector is a head of a reshape sector.
Factor this out into a simple helper called ahead_of_reshape().
This appears to fix the first bio_wouldblock_error() check which appears
to have comparison operators that didn't match the check below which
causes a schedule. Besides this, no functional changes intended.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 7f7d1546b9ba..97b23c18402b 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -5787,6 +5787,15 @@ static void make_discard_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio *bi)
bio_endio(bi);
}
+static bool ahead_of_reshape(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector,
+ sector_t reshape_sector)
+{
+ if (mddev->reshape_backwards)
+ return sector < reshape_sector;
+ else
+ return sector >= reshape_sector;
+}
+
static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
{
struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
@@ -5843,9 +5852,8 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
/* Bail out if conflicts with reshape and REQ_NOWAIT is set */
if ((bi->bi_opf & REQ_NOWAIT) &&
(conf->reshape_progress != MaxSector) &&
- (mddev->reshape_backwards
- ? (logical_sector > conf->reshape_progress && logical_sector <= conf->reshape_safe)
- : (logical_sector >= conf->reshape_safe && logical_sector < conf->reshape_progress))) {
+ !ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector, conf->reshape_progress) &&
+ ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector, conf->reshape_safe)) {
bio_wouldblock_error(bi);
if (rw == WRITE)
md_write_end(mddev);
@@ -5874,14 +5882,12 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
* to check again.
*/
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
- if (mddev->reshape_backwards
- ? logical_sector < conf->reshape_progress
- : logical_sector >= conf->reshape_progress) {
+ if (ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector,
+ conf->reshape_progress)) {
previous = 1;
} else {
- if (mddev->reshape_backwards
- ? logical_sector < conf->reshape_safe
- : logical_sector >= conf->reshape_safe) {
+ if (ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector,
+ conf->reshape_safe)) {
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
schedule();
do_prepare = true;
@@ -5912,9 +5918,8 @@ static bool raid5_make_request(struct mddev *mddev, struct bio * bi)
*/
int must_retry = 0;
spin_lock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
- if (mddev->reshape_backwards
- ? logical_sector >= conf->reshape_progress
- : logical_sector < conf->reshape_progress)
+ if (!ahead_of_reshape(mddev, logical_sector,
+ conf->reshape_progress))
/* mismatch, need to try again */
must_retry = 1;
spin_unlock_irq(&conf->device_lock);
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists