linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: core: Rename _regulator_enable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220420141511.v2.1.I31ef0014c9597d53722ab513890f839f357fdfb3@changeid>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:22:12 -0700
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] regulator: core: Rename _regulator_enable_delay()

I want to use it in other contexts besides _regulator_do_enable().

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
---

Changes in v2:
 * Rename/retain this helper, instead of using fsleep() (see also patch
   2)

 drivers/regulator/core.c | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index d2553970a67b..8b188e56fd0b 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -2511,17 +2511,17 @@ static int regulator_ena_gpio_ctrl(struct regulator_dev *rdev, bool enable)
 }
 
 /**
- * _regulator_enable_delay - a delay helper function
+ * _regulator_delay_helper - a delay helper function
  * @delay: time to delay in microseconds
  *
  * Delay for the requested amount of time as per the guidelines in:
  *
  *     Documentation/timers/timers-howto.rst
  *
- * The assumption here is that regulators will never be enabled in
+ * The assumption here is that these regulator operations will never used in
  * atomic context and therefore sleeping functions can be used.
  */
-static void _regulator_enable_delay(unsigned int delay)
+static void _regulator_delay_helper(unsigned int delay)
 {
 	unsigned int ms = delay / 1000;
 	unsigned int us = delay % 1000;
@@ -2603,7 +2603,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 		s64 remaining = ktime_us_delta(end, ktime_get());
 
 		if (remaining > 0)
-			_regulator_enable_delay(remaining);
+			_regulator_delay_helper(remaining);
 	}
 
 	if (rdev->ena_pin) {
@@ -2630,14 +2630,14 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 	/* If poll_enabled_time is set, poll upto the delay calculated
 	 * above, delaying poll_enabled_time uS to check if the regulator
 	 * actually got enabled.
-	 * If the regulator isn't enabled after enable_delay has
-	 * expired, return -ETIMEDOUT.
+	 * If the regulator isn't enabled after our delay helper has expired,
+	 * return -ETIMEDOUT.
 	 */
 	if (rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time) {
 		unsigned int time_remaining = delay;
 
 		while (time_remaining > 0) {
-			_regulator_enable_delay(rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time);
+			_regulator_delay_helper(rdev->desc->poll_enabled_time);
 
 			if (rdev->desc->ops->get_status) {
 				ret = _regulator_check_status_enabled(rdev);
@@ -2656,7 +2656,7 @@ static int _regulator_do_enable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 			return -ETIMEDOUT;
 		}
 	} else {
-		_regulator_enable_delay(delay);
+		_regulator_delay_helper(delay);
 	}
 
 	trace_regulator_enable_complete(rdev_get_name(rdev));
-- 
2.36.0.rc0.470.gd361397f0d-goog