[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220420145739.425c01603a6f63e550e556ed@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:57:39 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: lipeifeng@...o.com
Cc: peifeng55@...il.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 21cnbao@...il.com,
zhangshiming@...o.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: modify the method to search addr in unmapped_area
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:40:39 +0800 lipeifeng@...o.com wrote:
> The old method will firstly find the space in len(info->length
> + info->align_mask), and get address at the desired alignment.
>
> Sometime, addr would be failed if there are enough
> addr space in kernel by above method, e.g., you can't get a
> addr sized in 1Mbytes, align_mask 1Mbytes successfully although
> there are still (2M-1)bytes space in kernel.
>
> This patch would fix thr problem above by the new method: find the
> space in info->length and judge if at the desired info->align_mask
> at the same time.
>
> Do a simple test in TIF_32BIT with unmapped_area:
> - Try to take addr (size:1M align:2M) until allocation fails;
> - Try to take addr (size:1M align:1M) and account how to space can
> be alloced successfully.
>
> Before optimization: alloced 0 bytes.
> After optimization: alloced 1.9+G bytes.
Thanks.
Unfortunately this part of the code is undergoing a lot of change
lately. How serious is this problem? Please tell us how often the
problem is being observed, under what circumstances, etc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists