[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmCCdtF10dYZOQ2a@zn.tnic>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:22 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] platform/x86: intel_tdx_attest: Add TDX Guest
attestation interface driver
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 05:48:57AM -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> Make sense. We can just go with CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_ATTESTATION.
Sounds like you didn't read my mail. Kai was questioning the need for a
Kconfig symbol at all. And me too.
If this thing is not going to be used by anything else besides TDX
guests, why does it need a Kconfig option at all?!
> Boris, this is a simple platform driver which adds IOCTL interfaces to allow
> user space to get TDREPORT and TDQuote support.
>
> So, would prefer to leave in platform/x86 or move it to arch/x86/coco/tdx/ ?
See above.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists