[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87czhbfjsj.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:54:04 +1000
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>, fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com,
ajd@...ux.ibm.com, arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
alastair@...ilva.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: ocxl: fix possible double free in
ocxl_file_register_afu
Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com> writes:
> info_release() will be called in device_unregister() when info->dev's
> reference count is 0. So there is no need to call ocxl_afu_put() and
> kfree() again.
Double frees are often exploitable. But it looks to me like this error
path is not easily reachable by an attacker.
ocxl_file_register_afu() is only called from ocxl_probe(), and we only
go to err_unregister if the sysfs or cdev initialisation fails, which
should only happen if we hit ENOMEM, or we have a duplicate device which
would be a device-tree/hardware error. But maybe Fred can check more
closely, I don't know the driver that well.
cheers
> Fix this by adding free_minor() and return to err_unregister error path.
>
> Fixes: 75ca758adbaf ("ocxl: Create a clear delineation between ocxl backend & frontend")
> Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> index d881f5e40ad9..6777c419a8da 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/ocxl/file.c
> @@ -556,7 +556,9 @@ int ocxl_file_register_afu(struct ocxl_afu *afu)
>
> err_unregister:
> ocxl_sysfs_unregister_afu(info); // safe to call even if register failed
> + free_minor(info);
> device_unregister(&info->dev);
> + return rc;
> err_put:
> ocxl_afu_put(afu);
> free_minor(info);
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists