[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYmKbHOZChSHjB-ykQCyCziwYTO_+Ai2vheo0y-vD_akA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 01:01:37 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Bert Vermeulen <bert@...t.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/6] gpio: realtek-otto: Support reversed port layouts
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 9:56 PM Sander Vanheule <sander@...nheule.net> wrote:
> + if (dev_flags & GPIO_PORTS_REVERSED) {
> + bgpio_flags = 0;
> + ctrl->port_offset_u8 = realtek_gpio_port_offset_u8_rev;
> + ctrl->port_offset_u16 = realtek_gpio_port_offset_u16_rev;
> + } else {
> + bgpio_flags = BGPIOF_BIG_ENDIAN_BYTE_ORDER;
> + ctrl->port_offset_u8 = realtek_gpio_port_offset_u8;
> + ctrl->port_offset_u16 = realtek_gpio_port_offset_u16;
> + }
Just checking: is this really a different silicon block, or is this
GPIO_PORTS_REVERSED flag passed around just a way of saying:
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN)) ...?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists