[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220420192807.75a70b44@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 19:28:07 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
xiaowei66@...wei.com, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH sysctl-next] ftrace: fix building with SYSCTL=n but
DYNAMIC_FTRACE=y
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 14:54:04 -0700
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> Steven,
>
> As with the other fixes I can take this in through sysctl-next if you
> are OK with that, please let me know.
Honestly I would love to just nuke the ftrace_enabled sysctl, it's totally
obsolete. Perhaps I should have it trigger some kind of warning message
that it will be going away soon, and perhaps we can remove it?
Anyway, yeah, take this through your tree.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists