lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1b88a6e08feee137df9acd2cdf37f7685171f4b.camel@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:16:25 +1200
From:   Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To:     Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
        len.brown@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/21] x86/virt/tdx: Implement the SEAMCALL base
 function

On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 07:07 -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
> 
> On 4/5/22 9:49 PM, Kai Huang wrote:
> > SEAMCALL leaf functions use an ABI different from the x86-64 system-v
> > ABI.  Instead, they share the same ABI with the TDCALL leaf functions.
> 
> TDCALL is a new term for this patch set. Maybe add some detail about
> it in ()?.
> 
> > 

TDCALL implementation is already in tip/tdx.  This series will be rebased to it.
I don't think we need to explain more about something that is already in the tip
tree?


-- 
Thanks,
-Kai


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ