[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1b88a6e08feee137df9acd2cdf37f7685171f4b.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:16:25 +1200
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@...gle.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com,
len.brown@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, reinette.chatre@...el.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/21] x86/virt/tdx: Implement the SEAMCALL base
function
On Tue, 2022-04-19 at 07:07 -0700, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
>
> On 4/5/22 9:49 PM, Kai Huang wrote:
> > SEAMCALL leaf functions use an ABI different from the x86-64 system-v
> > ABI. Instead, they share the same ABI with the TDCALL leaf functions.
>
> TDCALL is a new term for this patch set. Maybe add some detail about
> it in ()?.
>
> >
TDCALL implementation is already in tip/tdx. This series will be rebased to it.
I don't think we need to explain more about something that is already in the tip
tree?
--
Thanks,
-Kai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists