[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d397577e14a5ca04f883d866e4ef1a1fddf19c8d.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:24:13 +0800
From: "ying.huang@...el.com" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Gautham R. Shenoy" <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org,
lkp@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com,
fengwei.yin@...el.com, aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com,
yu.c.chen@...el.com, kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [sched/fair] 2cfb7a1b03: stress-ng.fstat.ops_per_sec -19.8%
regression
Hi, Mel,
On Mon, 2022-04-18 at 22:18 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> (please be noted we reported "[sched/fair] 2cfb7a1b03: fsmark.files_per_sec
> -26.2% regression" at
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220303153108.GC14527@xsang-OptiPlex-9020/
> when this is still on branch:
> commit: 2cfb7a1b031b0e816af7a6ee0c6ab83b0acdf05a ("sched/fair: Improve consistency of allowed NUMA balance calculations")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git sched/core
>
> now we noticed the similar performance changes as well as some others are
> still existing on mainline, so report this again for information)
>
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -19.8% regression of stress-ng.fstat.ops_per_sec due to commit:
>
>
> commit: 2cfb7a1b031b0e816af7a6ee0c6ab83b0acdf05a ("sched/fair: Improve consistency of allowed NUMA balance calculations")
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>
> in testcase: stress-ng
> on test machine: 96 threads 2 sockets Ice Lake with 256G memory
> with following parameters:
>
> nr_threads: 10%
> disk: 1HDD
> testtime: 60s
> fs: f2fs
> class: filesystem
> test: fstat
> cpufreq_governor: performance
> ucode: 0xb000280
>
>
> In addition to that, the commit also has significant impact on the following tests:
>
> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > testcase: change | phoronix-test-suite: phoronix-test-suite.neatbench.CPU.fps 12.5% improvement |
> > test machine | 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 512G memory |
> > test parameters | cpufreq_governor=performance |
> > | option_a=CPU |
> > | test=neatbench-1.0.4 |
> > | ucode=0x500320a |
> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > testcase: change | phoronix-test-suite: phoronix-test-suite.neatbench.All.fps 15.2% improvement |
> > test machine | 96 threads 2 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6252 CPU @ 2.10GHz with 512G memory |
> > test parameters | cpufreq_governor=performance |
> > | option_a=All (CPU + GPU) |
> > | test=neatbench-1.0.4 |
> > | ucode=0x500320a |
> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > testcase: change | fsmark: fsmark.files_per_sec -9.9% regression |
> > test machine | 192 threads 4 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory |
> > test parameters | cpufreq_governor=performance |
> > | disk=1BRD_48G |
> > | filesize=4M |
> > | fs=f2fs |
> > | iterations=1x |
> > | nr_threads=64t |
> > | sync_method=fsyncBeforeClose |
> > | test_size=24G |
> > | ucode=0x500320a |
> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > testcase: change | fsmark: fsmark.files_per_sec -26.2% regression |
> > test machine | 192 threads 4 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory |
> > test parameters | cpufreq_governor=performance |
> > | disk=1BRD_48G |
> > | filesize=4M |
> > | fs=ext4 |
> > | iterations=1x |
> > | nr_threads=64t |
> > | sync_method=NoSync |
> > | test_size=24G |
> > | ucode=0x500320a |
> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > testcase: change | stress-ng: stress-ng.fstat.ops_per_sec -20.1% regression |
> > test machine | 96 threads 2 sockets Ice Lake with 256G memory |
> > test parameters | class=filesystem |
> > | cpufreq_governor=performance |
> > | disk=1HDD |
> > | fs=xfs |
> > | nr_threads=10% |
> > | test=fstat |
> > | testtime=60s |
> > | ucode=0xb000280 |
> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > testcase: change | fsmark: fsmark.files_per_sec -16.3% regression |
> > test machine | 192 threads 4 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 9242 CPU @ 2.30GHz with 192G memory |
> > test parameters | cpufreq_governor=performance |
> > | disk=1BRD_48G |
> > | filesize=4M |
> > | fs=ext4 |
> > | iterations=1x |
> > | nr_threads=64t |
> > | sync_method=fsyncBeforeClose |
> > | test_size=24G |
> > | ucode=0x500320a |
> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > testcase: change | stress-ng: stress-ng.fstat.ops_per_sec -20.2% regression |
> > test machine | 96 threads 2 sockets Ice Lake with 256G memory |
> > test parameters | class=filesystem |
> > | cpufreq_governor=performance |
> > | disk=1HDD |
> > | fs=xfs |
> > | nr_threads=10% |
> > | test=fstat |
> > | testtime=60s |
> > | ucode=0xb000280 |
> +------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
When I worked on the following regression report,
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87tuc7fp9k.fsf@yhuang6-desk2.ccr.corp.intel.com/
I found stress-ng throughput will regress if the tasks are distrubuted
more evenly among NUMA nodes. So for this regression, I re-tested with
mpstat per node statistics. The results are as follows,
mpstat.node.0.user% mpstat.node.1.user% mpstat.node.0.sys% mpstat.node.1.sys%
889c5d60fb 3.04 2.65 30.0 25.8
2cfb7a1b03 2.39 2.28 31.2 28.9
It can be found that the task are balanced better with the commit
2cfb7a1b03. So I think the regression isn't a real problem.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
Powered by blists - more mailing lists