[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220420091552.GD2387@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:15:52 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <sha@...gutronix.de>
To: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
lars@...afoo.de, broonie@...nel.org, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ASoC: dmaengine: do not use a NULL
prepare_slave_config() callback
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 02:21:57PM +0200, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> Even if struct snd_dmaengine_pcm_config is used, prepare_slave_config()
> callback might not be set. Check if this callback is set before using it.
>
> Fixes: fa654e085300 ("ASoC: dmaengine-pcm: Provide default config")
> Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@...rochip.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2,v3:
> - none
>
> sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c b/sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c
> index 285441d6aeed..2ab2ddc1294d 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-generic-dmaengine-pcm.c
> @@ -86,10 +86,10 @@ static int dmaengine_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_soc_component *component,
>
> memset(&slave_config, 0, sizeof(slave_config));
>
> - if (!pcm->config)
> - prepare_slave_config = snd_dmaengine_pcm_prepare_slave_config;
> - else
> + if (pcm->config && pcm->config->prepare_slave_config)
> prepare_slave_config = pcm->config->prepare_slave_config;
> + else
> + prepare_slave_config = snd_dmaengine_pcm_prepare_slave_config;
>
> if (prepare_slave_config) {
> int ret = prepare_slave_config(substream, params, &slave_config);
I wonder if this patch is correct. There are drivers like
sound/soc/mxs/mxs-pcm.c which call snd_dmaengine_pcm_register() with a
config which has the prepare_slave_config callback unset. For these
drivers dmaengine_pcm_hw_params() previously was a no-op. Now with this
patch snd_dmaengine_pcm_prepare_slave_config() and
dmaengine_slave_config() are called. At least for the mxs-pcm driver
calling dmaengine_slave_config() will return -ENOSYS.
At least the "Check if this callback is set before using it" part is
wrong, the callback is checked before using it with
if (prepare_slave_config) {
...
}
I don't have any mxs hardware at hand to test this. I just stumbled upon
the change of behaviour when rebasing
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/alsa-devel/patch/20220301122111.1073174-1-s.hauer@pengutronix.de/
on current master.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists