[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fb468756-2f80-3e0b-91d9-8e6a0679f36c@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 12:34:00 +0200
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: s390: selftests: Use TAP interface in the
reset test
On 4/19/22 20:58, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Let's standardize the s390x KVM selftest output to the TAP output
> generated via the kselftests.h interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
[...]
> - return 0;
> +
> + ksft_finished();
main() is still int so it looks really weird, that we remove the return
here. After reading the ksft_finished() code I know that we never return
because we do an exit() but I'd like to have a comment, change to void
or noreturn tag to make this clearer.
I'd guess that's true for all 4 patches.
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists