[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yl/y7GWdKCbVPeYS@hyeyoo>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 20:47:56 +0900
From: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc: cl@...ux.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/slub: remove unneeded return value of slab_pad_check
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 08:03:52PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> The return value of slab_pad_check is never used. So we can make it return
> void now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> ---
> mm/slub.c | 12 +++++-------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> index 6dc703488d30..1f699ddfff7f 100644
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -1017,7 +1017,7 @@ static int check_pad_bytes(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab, u8 *p)
> }
>
> /* Check the pad bytes at the end of a slab page */
> -static int slab_pad_check(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
> +static void slab_pad_check(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
> {
> u8 *start;
> u8 *fault;
> @@ -1027,21 +1027,21 @@ static int slab_pad_check(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
> int remainder;
>
> if (!(s->flags & SLAB_POISON))
> - return 1;
> + return;
>
> start = slab_address(slab);
> length = slab_size(slab);
> end = start + length;
> remainder = length % s->size;
> if (!remainder)
> - return 1;
> + return;
>
> pad = end - remainder;
> metadata_access_enable();
> fault = memchr_inv(kasan_reset_tag(pad), POISON_INUSE, remainder);
> metadata_access_disable();
> if (!fault)
> - return 1;
> + return;
> while (end > fault && end[-1] == POISON_INUSE)
> end--;
>
> @@ -1050,7 +1050,6 @@ static int slab_pad_check(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
> print_section(KERN_ERR, "Padding ", pad, remainder);
>
> restore_bytes(s, "slab padding", POISON_INUSE, fault, end);
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static int check_object(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> @@ -1642,8 +1641,7 @@ static inline int free_debug_processing(
> void *head, void *tail, int bulk_cnt,
> unsigned long addr) { return 0; }
>
> -static inline int slab_pad_check(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab)
> - { return 1; }
> +static inline void slab_pad_check(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab) {}
> static inline int check_object(struct kmem_cache *s, struct slab *slab,
> void *object, u8 val) { return 1; }
> static inline void add_full(struct kmem_cache *s, struct kmem_cache_node *n,
Seems the return value was not used even at birth of SLUB.
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
Thanks!
> --
> 2.23.0
>
>
--
Thanks,
Hyeonggon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists