[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmAE2IVRgPyWxmbn@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 14:04:24 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
Cc: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>,
Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Takahiro Kuwano <tkuw584924@...il.com>,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-mem: check if data buffers are on stack
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 03:50:22PM +0530, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> The buffers passed in the data phase must be DMA-able. Programmers often
> don't realise this requirement and pass in buffers that reside on the
> stack. This can be hard to spot when reviewing code. Reject ops if their
> data buffer is on the stack to avoid this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Include task_stack.h. It might not get included indirectly on some
> platforms and can cause build failures.
> - Add a WARN_ON_ONCE() for debuggability.
> - Add Mark's Ack.
Since this is now an isolated patch does that mean whatever meant that I
acked rather than applying this patch has gone in and I can now apply it
directly?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists