[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4e3309d9-879f-3385-3e8e-0fa1a31ddd9a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 21:35:55 +0800
From: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: fsl: Fix error handling in pcm030_fabric_probe
On 2022/4/20 21:00, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 02:18:52AM +0000, Miaoqian Lin wrote:
>> This will call twice platform_device_put()
>> if both platform_device_add() and snd_soc_register_card() fails.
>> return early on error to avoid duplicating the error code logic.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@...il.com>
>> ---
>> changes in v2:
>> - use return statement to return early when fails
>> - rebase on top of commit 559089e0a93d ("vmalloc: replace VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP with VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP")
> Why rebase on top of that seemingly random commit? Is there some sort
> of dependency here?
Hi, it the head of master in when I made this patch. It's because you pointed out
that patch v1 doesn't apply against current code. But I am not sure what's the problem.
So I ensure the codebase is up-to-date. If this patch have no conflict, you can ignore it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists