lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220420023241.14335-4-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 10:32:41 +0800
From:   Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
To:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc:     vinod.koul@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
        bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] soundwire: bus: pm_runtime_request_resume on peripheral attachment

From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>

In typical use cases, the peripheral becomes pm_runtime active as a
result of the ALSA/ASoC framework starting up a DAI. The parent/child
hierarchy guarantees that the manager device will be fully resumed
beforehand.

There is however a corner case where the manager device may become
pm_runtime active, but without ALSA/ASoC requesting any functionality
from the peripherals. In this case, the hardware peripheral device
will report as ATTACHED and its initialization routine will be
executed. If this initialization routine initiates any sort of
deferred processing, there is a possibility that the manager could
suspend without the peripheral suspend sequence being invoked: from
the pm_runtime framework perspective, the peripheral is *already*
suspended.

To avoid such disconnects between hardware state and pm_runtime state,
this patch adds an asynchronous pm_request_resume() upon successful
attach/initialization which will result in the proper resume/suspend
sequence to be followed on the peripheral side.

BugLink: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/3459
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/soundwire/bus.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
index 354d3f89366f..8b7a680f388e 100644
--- a/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
+++ b/drivers/soundwire/bus.c
@@ -1838,6 +1838,18 @@ int sdw_handle_slave_status(struct sdw_bus *bus,
 				__func__, slave->dev_num);
 
 			complete(&slave->initialization_complete);
+
+			/*
+			 * If the manager became pm_runtime active, the peripherals will be
+			 * restarted and attach, but their pm_runtime status may remain
+			 * suspended. If the 'update_slave_status' callback initiates
+			 * any sort of deferred processing, this processing would not be
+			 * cancelled on pm_runtime suspend.
+			 * To avoid such zombie states, we queue a request to resume.
+			 * This would be a no-op in case the peripheral was being resumed
+			 * by e.g. the ALSA/ASoC framework.
+			 */
+			pm_request_resume(&slave->dev);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.17.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ