[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+5TbfFxD3p4ckvNw=jFweuvjQPRQfjmvPqZJga25o0pA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 09:25:53 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Cc: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>, Vinod <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Bin Meng <bin.meng@...driver.com>,
Green Wan <green.wan@...ive.com>,
"open list:DMA GENERIC OFFLOAD ENGINE SUBSYSTEM"
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Determine the number of DMA channels by
'dma-channels' property
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 7:18 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2022 04:43:35 PDT (-0700), zong.li@...ive.com wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 6:48 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11-04-22, 10:51, Zong Li wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 9:13 PM Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > On 28-03-22, 17:52, Zong Li wrote:
> >> > > > The PDMA driver currently assumes there are four channels by default, it
> >> > > > might cause the error if there is actually less than four channels.
> >> > > > Change that by getting number of channel dynamically from device tree.
> >> > > > For backwards-compatible, it uses the default value (i.e. 4) when there
> >> > > > is no 'dma-channels' information in dts.
> >> > >
> >> > > Applied patch 1 & 4 to dmaengine-next, thanks
> >> >
> >> > Hi Vinod,
> >> > Thanks for your help and review. For patch 2 and 3, does it mean that
> >> > we should go through the riscv tree?
> >>
> >> Yes
> >>
> >
> > Hi Palmer,
> > Could you please help me to pick up the patch 2 and 3. Thanks :)
>
> Sorry about that, I forgot about this one. I just put them on for-next,
> there was a minor merge conflict but it looks pretty simple.
Looks like you applied patch 1 too which Vinod already applied to the
dmaengine tree. And you changed the 1st line removing the "# " before
the SPDX tag which results in:
make[1]: *** Deleting file
'Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.example.dts'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/local/bin/dt-extract-example", line 52, in <module>
binding = yaml.load(open(args.yamlfile, encoding='utf-8').read())
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/ruamel/yaml/main.py",
line 434, in load
return constructor.get_single_data()
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.8/dist-packages/ruamel/yaml/constructor.py",
line 119, in get_single_data
node = self.composer.get_single_node()
File "_ruamel_yaml.pyx", line 718, in _ruamel_yaml.CParser.get_single_node
ruamel.yaml.composer.ComposerError: expected a single document in the stream
in "<unicode string>", line 1, column 1
but found another document
in "<unicode string>", line 2, column 1
make[1]: *** [Documentation/devicetree/bindings/Makefile:26:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.example.dts]
Error 1
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/sifive,fu540-c000-pdma.yaml:1:1:
[error] missing document start "---" (document-start)
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists