[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmAnh/fgbPmTRUqj@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2022 11:32:23 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/uffd: Hide PTE_MARKER option
On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 04:25:31PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> The PTE_MARKER option should not need to be exposed to the kernel builder,
> keep it internal and remove the prompt so it won't be seen.
>
> Instead, make the PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP option to explicitly choose PTE_MARKER
> when necessary.
>
> While PTE_MARKER_UFFD_WP will still prompt to user, change the wording so
> that it'll not mention PTE_MARKER at all but renaming it to "Userfaultfd
> write protection support for shmem/hugetlbfs".
>
> Reported-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Thank you Peter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists