linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/14] Refactor Ralink Pinctrl and Add Documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 17:43:35 +0300
From:   Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>,
        Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14] Refactor Ralink Pinctrl and Add Documentation

On 21/04/2022 17:27, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:08 AM Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com> wrote:
> 
>> This patch series brings complete refactoring to the Ralink pinctrl driver
>> and its subdrivers.
> 
> I just merged all the patches, the comments seem minor and any further
> fixes can certainly be done on top of this. Anyone interested in ralink
> working nicely is likely in the thread and we mostly care about that this
> works for OpenWrt, and if it works for them we are happy.
> 
>>    mips: dts: ralink: mt7621: use the new compatible string for MT7621 pinctrl
> 
> This was a bit scary since we usually take these through the respective
> SoC tree, but I just applied it anyway, it makes logical sense in the
> series.
> 
> I hope it will not lead to conflicts.
> 
> Good work with this series!

Thanks. There is a v2 of this series which has been waiting for a week, 
I hope that was the one you applied as you replied under v1 (I'm not 
sure which repository you applied this so I can't check myself).

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=632370

Arınç