[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9b99e246-fbdf-2d78-7773-bf4481a8e122@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 23:00:38 +0800
From: JeffleXu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-cachefs@...hat.com, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, willy@...radead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
bo.liu@...ux.alibaba.com, tao.peng@...ux.alibaba.com,
gerry@...ux.alibaba.com, eguan@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luodaowen.backend@...edance.com,
tianzichen@...ishou.com, fannaihao@...du.com,
zhangjiachen.jaycee@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 05/21] cachefiles: implement on-demand read
On 4/21/22 10:14 PM, David Howells wrote:
> Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> A new NETFS_SREQ_ONDEMAND flag is introduced to indicate that on-demand
>> read should be done when a cache miss encountered.
>
> That may conflict with changes I'm making - but it's just a matter of flag
> renumbering.
>
>> +#define CACHEFILES_IOC_CREAD _IOW(0x98, 1, int)
>
> I wonder if CACHEFILES_IOC_READ_COMPLETE would be a better name,
Okay, it sounds more readable. Thanks.
but apart
> from that:
>
> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
Jeffle
Powered by blists - more mailing lists