[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmGFKdVAuG5JEfzg@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 18:24:09 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, sven@...npeter.dev, alyssa@...enzweig.io,
marcan@...can.st, martink@...teo.de, saranya.gopal@...el.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: typec: tipd: improve handling of failures in
interrupt handlers
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 09:00:13AM -0400, Tom Rix wrote:
> clang static analysis reports this representative issue
> core.c:516:6: warning: Branch condition evaluates
> to a garbage value
> if (event)
> ^~~~~
>
> In cd321x_interrupt(), a successful call to
> tps6598x_read64() is the only way event is set,
> and if a failure happens the irq should not be
> reported as handled.
Please use the full 72 columns.
>
> Instead of initializing event, rework the
> usage of ret by initializing it to IRQ_NONE
> and then setting it when event is known to
> be not zero. This removes the if-statement
> before the return.
So the code today is correct, but clang is wrong? We don't need to do
anything then...
> tps6598x_interrupt() is similar.
This line makes no sense, sorry.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists