lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 21:52:14 +0200
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To:     Larry.Finger@...inger.net, Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>
Cc:     phil@...lpotter.co.uk, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, jhpark1013@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/7] staging: r8188eu: remove unnecessary braces in single statement block

On giovedì 21 aprile 2022 21:20:26 CEST Jaehee Park wrote:
> Remove braces for single statement block to minimize the number of
> empty lines, without loss of readability. Issue found with checkpatch.
> WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaehee Park <jhpark1013@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/
r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> index 3e9882f89f76..d3f4d7cdfa08 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_mlme.c
> @@ -112,9 +112,8 @@ void _rtw_free_mlme_priv(struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv)
>  
>  	rtw_free_mlme_priv_ie_data(pmlmepriv);
>  
> -	if (pmlmepriv) {
> +	if (pmlmepriv)
>  		vfree(pmlmepriv->free_bss_buf);
> -	}
>  
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Hi Jaehee,

If you just want to remove the braces, your patch is good.

But... Did you ask yourself why this code needs to test if "pmlmepriv" is 
valid before calling vfree() on it? Actually, the code doesn't need this 
test, it just needs to call "vfree(pmlmepriv)" unconditionally.

OK, I know that this is not directly related to your patch or any other 
that is explicitly made just for removing unnecessary braces... 

vfree() behaves as a no-op function on NULL pointers, therefore there is no 
need to test whether or not "pmlmepriv" is valid.

Thanks,

Fabio M. De Francesco



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ