linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] md/raid5: Factor out ahead_of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:33:34 +0100
From:   Wol <antlists@...ngman.org.uk>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@...eticom.com>,
        David Sloan <David.Sloan@...eticom.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] md/raid5: Factor out ahead_of_reshape() function

On 21/04/2022 17:05, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
>> I like the ternary operator.;-)
>>
>>      return mddev->reshape_backwards ? (return sector < reshape_sector) :
>> (sector >= reshape_sector)
>>
>> Sorry, does not matter.
> Yeah, I think plenty of people do not, though; it's harder to read with
> the long line and awkward to wrap.
> 
I like the ternary too, but is there a superfluous return in there? That 
would shorten the line. Or break it on the question mark - condition, 
true, false all on their own lines.

Cheers,
Wol