linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] siphash: update the HalfSipHash documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YmHrWy2o72k2cFLM@sol.localdomain>
Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 16:40:11 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] siphash: update the HalfSipHash documentation

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 01:08:01AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 10:44 PM Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:
> > -Danger!
> > +**Danger!** HalfSipHash should only be used in a very limited set of use cases
> > +where nothing better is possible, namely:
> >
> > -Do not ever use HalfSipHash except for as a hashtable key function, and only
> > -then when you can be absolutely certain that the outputs will never be
> > -transmitted out of the kernel. This is only remotely useful over `jhash` as a
> > -means of mitigating hashtable flooding denial of service attacks.
> > +- Hashtable key functions, where the outputs will never be transmitted out of
> > +  the kernel. This is only remotely useful over `jhash` as a means of mitigating
> > +  hashtable flooding denial of service attacks.
> 
> I think we should actually drop this chunk of the patch. You wrote in
> your commit message, "HalfSipHash-1-3 is not entirely limited to
> hashtable functions, with it now being used in the interrupt entropy
> accumulator." But in fact, random.c uses HalfSipHash-1, with no three
> round finalization (since we use BLAKE2s for that). So it's not
> _quite_ the same thing. If it were, we could have gotten away by just
> calling the actual hsiphash function, but instead it's just applying
> the round function as a permutation.
> 
> If you feel strongly that somebody might accidentally copy and paste
> that after grepping for halfsiphash and trying to figure out how to
> use it, I suppose we could keep this. But it strikes me as very much
> not the same thing as the hsiphash_* family of functions.

Well, this documentation starts out by introducing HalfSipHash, and then moves
on to the the hsiphash functions.  This part is still talking about HalfSipHash,
so in that context the mention of its use in random.c is relevant.  But I could
certainly reword it to make it all about the hsiphash functions, with
HalfSipHash being mentioned more as an implementation detail.

- Eric