linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Docs: Update information at changes.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2f4c72d2-4669-4217-f322-9d4f34c3053e@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 14:50:24 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Bruno Moreira-Guedes <codeagain@...eagain.dev>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        outreachy@...ts.linux.dev,
        Bruno's Patch Watchbox <patch-reply@...eagain.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Docs: Update information at changes.rst

On 4/21/22 04:34, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
>> Thanks, Jon! I have also been thinking whether this filename
>> ('changes.rst') is a good description of the file contents. Do you think
>> renaming it to something like 'requirements.rst' and updating its
>> references would be a good patch?
> 
> It's best not to rename things unnecessarily, especially relatively
> well-known files that a lot of people expect to find in a specific
> place.  We've done a lot of renaming over the last few years, but this
> is one I might let slide for now.
> 

Did you mean the rename will be benefical?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara