[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220421083345.GA8303@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:33:45 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: joro@...tes.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
sven@...npeter.dev, robdclark@...il.com, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, yong.wu@...iatek.com,
mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com,
zhang.lyra@...il.com, thierry.reding@...il.com, vdumpa@...dia.com,
jean-philippe@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] iommu/arm-smmu: Clean up bus_set_iommu()
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 05:05:03PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2022-04-19 15:40, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 01:42:33PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > Stop calling bus_set_iommu() since it's now unnecessary. With device
> > > probes now replayed for every IOMMU instance registration, the whole
> > > sorry ordering workaround for legacy DT bindings goes too, hooray!
> >
> > Ha, I hope you tested this!
>
> Oh alright then, since it's you... :)
>
> I've hacked up a Juno DT with the old bindings, and (after needing a while
> to remember that they're fundamentally incompatible with disable_bypass),
> can confirm that with my whole dev branch including this series applied, it
> boots and creates IOMMU groups as expected. I then made the mistake of
> trying without the branch to check whether the squawks from
> iommu_setup_dma_ops() were new or not, and... well... plain rc3 doesn't even
> boot on the same setup - it's somehow blowing up in the failure cleanup path
> of iommu_bus_init(), apparently calling iommu_release_device() on something
> where dev->iommu->iommu_dev is NULL, for reasons that are far from clear and
> I'm not sure I can really be bothered to debug further... :/
Great, so your series is a fix!
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists