| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YmEm63zrdQ3q/ooW@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 09:42:03 +0000
From: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@...omium.org>
To: Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] pwm: pwm-cros-ec: add channel type support
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 01:52:02AM -0700, Prashant Malani wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 1:34 AM Fabio Baltieri
> <fabiobaltieri@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 05:55:35PM +0000, Prashant Malani wrote:
> > > On Apr 20 14:15, Fabio Baltieri wrote:
> > > > Add support for EC_PWM_TYPE_DISPLAY_LIGHT and EC_PWM_TYPE_KB_LIGHT pwm
> > > > types to the PWM cros_ec_pwm driver. This allows specifying one of these
> > > > PWM channel by functionality, and let the EC firmware pick the correct
> > > > channel, thus abstracting the hardware implementation from the kernel
> > > > driver.
> > > >
> > > > To use it, define the node with the "google,cros-ec-pwm-type"
> > > > compatible.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Fabio Baltieri <fabiobaltieri@...omium.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
> > > > index 5e29d9c682c3..7f10f56c3eb6 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c
> > > > @@ -12,17 +12,21 @@
> > > > #include <linux/pwm.h>
> > > > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > > >
> > > > +#include <dt-bindings/mfd/cros_ec.h>
> > > > +
> > > > /**
> > > > * struct cros_ec_pwm_device - Driver data for EC PWM
> > > > *
> > > > * @dev: Device node
> > > > * @ec: Pointer to EC device
> > > > * @chip: PWM controller chip
> > > > + * @use_pwm_type: Use PWM types instead of generic channels
> > > > */
> > > > struct cros_ec_pwm_device {
> > > > struct device *dev;
> > > > struct cros_ec_device *ec;
> > > > struct pwm_chip chip;
> > > > + bool use_pwm_type;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > /**
> > > > @@ -58,14 +62,31 @@ static void cros_ec_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
> > > > kfree(channel);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static int cros_ec_pwm_set_duty(struct cros_ec_device *ec, u8 index, u16 duty)
> > > > +static int cros_ec_dt_type_to_pwm_type(u8 dt_index, u8 *pwm_type)
> > > > {
> > > > + switch (dt_index) {
> > > > + case CROS_EC_PWM_DT_KB_LIGHT:
> > > > + *pwm_type = EC_PWM_TYPE_KB_LIGHT;
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > + case CROS_EC_PWM_DT_DISPLAY_LIGHT:
> > > > + *pwm_type = EC_PWM_TYPE_DISPLAY_LIGHT;
> > > > + return 0;
> > > > + default:
> > > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > > + }
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static int cros_ec_pwm_set_duty(struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm, u8 index,
> > > > + u16 duty)
> > > > +{
> > > > + struct cros_ec_device *ec = ec_pwm->ec;
> > > > struct {
> > > > struct cros_ec_command msg;
> > > > struct ec_params_pwm_set_duty params;
> > > > } __packed buf;
> > > > struct ec_params_pwm_set_duty *params = &buf.params;
> > > > struct cros_ec_command *msg = &buf.msg;
> > > > + int ret;
> > > >
> > > > memset(&buf, 0, sizeof(buf));
> > > >
> > > > @@ -75,14 +96,25 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_set_duty(struct cros_ec_device *ec, u8 index, u16 duty)
> > > > msg->outsize = sizeof(*params);
> > > >
> > > > params->duty = duty;
> > > > - params->pwm_type = EC_PWM_TYPE_GENERIC;
> > > > - params->index = index;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (ec_pwm->use_pwm_type) {
> > > > + ret = cros_ec_dt_type_to_pwm_type(index, ¶ms->pwm_type);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + dev_err(ec->dev, "Invalid PWM type index: %d\n", index);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > + params->index = 0;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + params->pwm_type = EC_PWM_TYPE_GENERIC;
> > > > + params->index = index;
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > return cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec, msg);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > -static int cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(struct cros_ec_device *ec, u8 index)
> > > > +static int cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm, u8 index)
> > > > {
> > > > + struct cros_ec_device *ec = ec_pwm->ec;
> > > > struct {
> > > > struct cros_ec_command msg;
> > > > union {
> > > > @@ -102,8 +134,17 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(struct cros_ec_device *ec, u8 index)
> > > > msg->insize = sizeof(*resp);
> > > > msg->outsize = sizeof(*params);
> > > >
> > > > - params->pwm_type = EC_PWM_TYPE_GENERIC;
> > > > - params->index = index;
> > > > + if (ec_pwm->use_pwm_type) {
> > > > + ret = cros_ec_dt_type_to_pwm_type(index, ¶ms->pwm_type);
> > > > + if (ret) {
> > > > + dev_err(ec->dev, "Invalid PWM type index: %d\n", index);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > + params->index = 0;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + params->pwm_type = EC_PWM_TYPE_GENERIC;
> > > > + params->index = index;
> > > > + }
> > > >
> > > > ret = cros_ec_cmd_xfer_status(ec, msg);
> > > > if (ret < 0)
> > > > @@ -133,7 +174,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > > > */
> > > > duty_cycle = state->enabled ? state->duty_cycle : 0;
> > > >
> > > > - ret = cros_ec_pwm_set_duty(ec_pwm->ec, pwm->hwpwm, duty_cycle);
> > > > + ret = cros_ec_pwm_set_duty(ec_pwm, pwm->hwpwm, duty_cycle);
> > > > if (ret < 0)
> > > > return ret;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -149,7 +190,7 @@ static void cros_ec_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> > > > struct cros_ec_pwm *channel = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > - ret = cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec_pwm->ec, pwm->hwpwm);
> > > > + ret = cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec_pwm, pwm->hwpwm);
> > > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > > dev_err(chip->dev, "error getting initial duty: %d\n", ret);
> > > > return;
> > > > @@ -204,13 +245,13 @@ static const struct pwm_ops cros_ec_pwm_ops = {
> > > > * of PWMs it supports directly, so we have to read the pwm duty cycle for
> > > > * subsequent channels until we get an error.
> > > > */
> > > > -static int cros_ec_num_pwms(struct cros_ec_device *ec)
> > > > +static int cros_ec_num_pwms(struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm)
> > > > {
> > > > int i, ret;
> > > >
> > > > /* The index field is only 8 bits */
> > > > for (i = 0; i <= U8_MAX; i++) {
> > > > - ret = cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec, i);
> > > > + ret = cros_ec_pwm_get_duty(ec_pwm, i);
> > > > /*
> > > > * We look for SUCCESS, INVALID_COMMAND, or INVALID_PARAM
> > > > * responses; everything else is treated as an error.
> > > > @@ -236,6 +277,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > {
> > > > struct cros_ec_device *ec = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> > > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> > > > struct cros_ec_pwm_device *ec_pwm;
> > > > struct pwm_chip *chip;
> > > > int ret;
> > > > @@ -251,17 +293,26 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > chip = &ec_pwm->chip;
> > > > ec_pwm->ec = ec;
> > > >
> > > > + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "google,cros-ec-pwm-type"))
> > > > + ec_pwm->use_pwm_type = true;
> > >
> > > Isn't it possible to just use an optional boolean property
> > > (for example: "use-pwm-type") instead of defining a new compatible
> > > string?
> >
> > Yeah that's what I did originally but Rob suggested to use a new
> > compatible instead:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/chrome-platform/Yk20uTE%2FVdm2c6jI@robh.at.kernel.org/
>
> Thanks for the context. I suppose one could use the "split number
> space" suggestion mentioned there,
> and still be able to supply the right arguments for
> pwm_request_from_chip() (since we're the ones
> supplying the argument via of_xlate). But, if the DT maintainer is
> alright with a new compatible, then
> of course you should go with whatever works for you.
Right, that would work for masking out the number space, but then you'd
end up with an incoherent chips->npwm which is used all over the core
pwm code (including the debugfs stuff), so to be coherent there I think
we have to have something at probe time and can't mix it up.
> > > > +
> > > > /* PWM chip */
> > > > chip->dev = dev;
> > > > chip->ops = &cros_ec_pwm_ops;
> > > > chip->of_xlate = cros_ec_pwm_xlate;
> > > > chip->of_pwm_n_cells = 1;
> > > > - ret = cros_ec_num_pwms(ec);
> > > > - if (ret < 0) {
> > > > - dev_err(dev, "Couldn't find PWMs: %d\n", ret);
> > > > - return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (ec_pwm->use_pwm_type) {
> > > > + chip->npwm = CROS_EC_PWM_DT_COUNT;
> > > > + } else {
> > > > + ret = cros_ec_num_pwms(ec_pwm);
> > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "Couldn't find PWMs: %d\n", ret);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > + chip->npwm = ret;
> > > > }
> > > > - chip->npwm = ret;
> > > > +
> > > > dev_dbg(dev, "Probed %u PWMs\n", chip->npwm);
> > > >
> > > > ret = pwmchip_add(chip);
> > > > @@ -288,6 +339,7 @@ static int cros_ec_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> > > > #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > > > static const struct of_device_id cros_ec_pwm_of_match[] = {
> > > > { .compatible = "google,cros-ec-pwm" },
> > > > + { .compatible = "google,cros-ec-pwm-type" },
> > > > {},
> > > > };
> > > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, cros_ec_pwm_of_match);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.36.0.rc0.470.gd361397f0d-goog
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> > --
> > Fabio Baltieri
--
Fabio Baltieri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists