[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6067d55-4800-b533-2ec7-02166977c825@amlogic.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 17:46:08 +0800
From: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-amlogic <linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] tty: serial: meson: Add a 12MHz internal clock
rate to calculate baud rate in order to meet the baud rate requirements of
special BT modules
Hi Neil,
On 2022/4/21 16:46, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> On 18/04/2022 14:09, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 8:50 AM Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> A /2 divider over XTAL was introduced since G12A, and is preferred
>>> to be used over the still present /3 divider since it provides much
>>> closer frequencies vs the request baudrate.Especially the BT module
>>
>> 'e. E' (mind the space)
>>
>>> uses 3Mhz baud rate. 8Mhz calculations can lead to baud rate bias,
>>> causing some problems.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> +struct meson_uart_data {
>>> + bool has_xtal_div2;
>>
>> I would prefer to see this as an unsigned int and with a less
>> particular name, e.g. xtal_div would suffice.
>>
>>> +};
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> + unsigned int xtal_div = 3;
>>
>>> + if (private_data && private_data->has_xtal_div2) {
>>> + xtal_div = 2;
>>
>> Better to define privata data always
>
> While I'm in favor of defining private data, here 3 and 2 are actually
> the values
> 2 and 3 used to divide.
>
> The code is easy to read and we quickly understand this value is the
> clock divider.
>
Therefore, this place should be modified according to your previous
suggestion.I will prepare the next version.
>>
>>
>>> + val |= AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL_DIV2;
>>> + }
>>> + val |= DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(port->uartclk / xtal_div,
>>> baud) - 1;
>>
>>
>
> .
Powered by blists - more mailing lists