[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220421114615.njmtsnuifqjpfum2@quack3.lan>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 13:46:15 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove unnecessary code in __mb_check_buddy
On Mon 04-04-22 23:22:43, Jinke Han wrote:
> From: Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
>
> When enter elseif branch, the the MB_CHECK_ASSERT will never fail.
> In addtion, the only illegal combination is 0/0, which can be caught
> by the first if branch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Ted, this seems to have fallen through the cracks...
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index e5d43d2ee474..eba650b31870 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -576,13 +576,10 @@ static int __mb_check_buddy(struct ext4_buddy *e4b, char *file,
> for (i = 0; i < max; i++) {
>
> if (mb_test_bit(i, buddy)) {
> - /* only single bit in buddy2 may be 1 */
> + /* only single bit in buddy2 may be 0 */
> if (!mb_test_bit(i << 1, buddy2)) {
> MB_CHECK_ASSERT(
> mb_test_bit((i<<1)+1, buddy2));
> - } else if (!mb_test_bit((i << 1) + 1, buddy2)) {
> - MB_CHECK_ASSERT(
> - mb_test_bit(i << 1, buddy2));
> }
> continue;
> }
> --
> 2.20.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists