[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <964ae72a-0484-67de-8143-a9a2d492a520@openvz.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 23:01:12 +0300
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...nvz.org>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, kernel@...nvz.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH memcg RFC] net: set proper memcg for net_init hooks
allocations
On 4/21/22 18:56, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2022 at 11:39 PM Vasily Averin <vvs@...nvz.org> wrote:
>> @@ -1147,7 +1148,13 @@ static int __register_pernet_operations(struct list_head *list,
>> * setup_net() and cleanup_net() are not possible.
>> */
>> for_each_net(net) {
>> + struct mem_cgroup *old, *memcg = NULL;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
>> + memcg = (net == &init_net) ? root_mem_cgroup : mem_cgroup_from_obj(net);
>
> memcg from obj is unstable, so you need a reference on memcg. You can
> introduce get_mem_cgroup_from_kmem() which works for both
> MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS and MEMCG_DATA_KMEM. For uncharged objects (like
> init_net) it should return NULL.
Could you please elaborate with more details?
It seems to me mem_cgroup_from_obj() does everything exactly as you say:
- for slab objects it returns memcg taken from according slab->memcg_data
- for ex-slab objects (i.e. page->memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS)
page_memcg_check() returns NULL
- for kmem objects (i.e. page->memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_KMEM)
page_memcg_check() returns objcg->memcg
- in another cases
page_memcg_check() returns page->memcg_data,
so for uncharged objects like init_net NULL should be returned.
I can introduce exported get_mem_cgroup_from_kmem(), however it should only
call mem_cgroup_from_obj(), perhaps under read_rcu_lock/unlock.
Do you mean something like this?
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -1768,4 +1768,14 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_from_obj(void *p)
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG_KMEM */
+static inline struct mem_cgroup *get_mem_cgroup_from_kmem(void *p)
+{
+ struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ memcg = mem_cgroup_from_obj(p);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return memcg;
+}
#endif /* _LINUX_MEMCONTROL_H */
diff --git a/net/core/net_namespace.c b/net/core/net_namespace.c
index a5b5bb99c644..4003c47965c9 100644
--- a/net/core/net_namespace.c
+++ b/net/core/net_namespace.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#include <net/net_namespace.h>
#include <net/netns/generic.h>
+#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
/*
* Our network namespace constructor/destructor lists
*/
@@ -1147,7 +1148,14 @@ static int __register_pernet_operations(struct list_head *list,
* setup_net() and cleanup_net() are not possible.
*/
for_each_net(net) {
+ struct mem_cgroup *old, *memcg;
+
+ memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_kmem(net);
+ if (memcg == NULL)
+ memcg = root_mem_cgroup;
+ old = set_active_memcg(memcg);
error = ops_init(ops, net);
+ set_active_memcg(old);
if (error)
goto out_undo;
list_add_tail(&net->exit_list, &net_exit_list);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists