linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: document the boot requirements for MTE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMn1gO7Drzj-sXy5qyCAzm01aFZx8QXHQ8F5C5=BDaDNuap_Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:29:21 -0700
From:   Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>
To:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: document the boot requirements for MTE

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 6:42 AM Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 09:04:04AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 02:18:58PM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> >
> > > +  For CPUs with the Memory Tagging Extension feature:
> > > +
> > > +  - If EL3 is present:
> > > +
> > > +    - SCR_EL3.ATA (bit 26) must be initialised to 0b1.
> > > +
> > > +  - If the kernel is entered at EL1 and EL2 is present:
> > > +
> > > +    - HCR_EL2.ATA (bit 56) must be initialised to 0b1.
> >
> > Very nitpicky but this is only required for FEAT_MTE2 and above, plain
> > FEAT_MTE doesn't have these traps.  I don't know that this is a thing
> > that anyone's actually implemented
>
> I think that's a valid point. CPUs may implement FEAT_MTE2 but downgrade
> it to FEAT_MTE if the SoC does not provide allocation tag storage. So we
> should make it clear here that only from FEAT_MTE2 we should set those
> bits (ID_AA64PFR1_EL1.MTE >= 2), otherwise they should be 0 or
> hyp/firmware risks the OS triggering random external aborts.
>
> > and from v8.7 on it's not permitted but the above isn't strictly true
> > if someone did for some reason have the most basic version.
>
> The wording is tricky: "This feature is mandatory from Armv8.7 when
> FEAT_MTE2 is implemented". So one can still implement FEAT_MTE (or none
> at all).

Okay, I changed it in v2 to explicitly say FEAT_MTE2.

Peter