[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220422212945.2227722-4-axelrasmussen@google.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:29:42 -0700
From: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Charan Teja Reddy <charante@...eaurora.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Dmitry V . Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>,
Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy <glebfm@...linux.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, zhangyi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/6] userfaultfd: selftests: modify selftest to use /dev/userfaultfd
We clearly want to ensure both userfaultfd(2) and /dev/userfaultfd keep
working into the future, so just run the test twice, using each
interface.
Signed-off-by: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
index 92a4516f8f0d..12ae742a9981 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c
@@ -77,6 +77,9 @@ static int bounces;
#define TEST_SHMEM 3
static int test_type;
+/* test using /dev/userfaultfd, instead of userfaultfd(2) */
+static bool test_dev_userfaultfd;
+
/* exercise the test_uffdio_*_eexist every ALARM_INTERVAL_SECS */
#define ALARM_INTERVAL_SECS 10
static volatile bool test_uffdio_copy_eexist = true;
@@ -383,13 +386,31 @@ static void assert_expected_ioctls_present(uint64_t mode, uint64_t ioctls)
}
}
+static void __userfaultfd_open_dev(void)
+{
+ int fd;
+
+ uffd = -1;
+ fd = open("/dev/userfaultfd", O_RDWR | O_CLOEXEC);
+ if (fd < 0)
+ return;
+
+ uffd = ioctl(fd, USERFAULTFD_IOC_NEW,
+ O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK | UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY);
+ close(fd);
+}
+
static void userfaultfd_open(uint64_t *features)
{
struct uffdio_api uffdio_api;
- uffd = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd, O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK | UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY);
+ if (test_dev_userfaultfd)
+ __userfaultfd_open_dev();
+ else
+ uffd = syscall(__NR_userfaultfd,
+ O_CLOEXEC | O_NONBLOCK | UFFD_USER_MODE_ONLY);
if (uffd < 0)
- err("userfaultfd syscall not available in this kernel");
+ err("creating userfaultfd failed");
uffd_flags = fcntl(uffd, F_GETFD, NULL);
uffdio_api.api = UFFD_API;
@@ -1698,6 +1719,12 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
}
printf("nr_pages: %lu, nr_pages_per_cpu: %lu\n",
nr_pages, nr_pages_per_cpu);
+
+ test_dev_userfaultfd = false;
+ if (userfaultfd_stress())
+ return 1;
+
+ test_dev_userfaultfd = true;
return userfaultfd_stress();
}
--
2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists