[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <165066910299.31949.2644161910386633325.b4-ty@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:14:06 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: <cgel.zte@...il.com>
CC: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<ssantosh@...nel.org>, Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Hi cgel.zte@...il.com,
On Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:29:55 +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
>
>
I have applied the following to branch ti-drivers-soc-next on [1].
Thank you!
I have done minor spelling fixups and subject line fixup.
[1/1] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
commit: 12eeb74925da70eb39d90abead9de9793be3d4c8
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists