linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 02/12] clk: mediatek: reset: Use simple reset operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f68239ac05bf119134b3203af9bd74d5af1bc6ba.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:57:47 +0800
From:   Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>
CC:     <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>, <wenst@...omium.org>,
        <runyang.chen@...iatek.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 02/12] clk: mediatek: reset: Use simple reset
 operations

On Thu, 2022-04-21 at 11:08 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 20/04/22 15:05, Rex-BC Chen ha scritto:
> > There are two version for clock reset register control of MediaTek
> > SoCs.
> > The reset operations before MT8183 can use simple reset to cover.
> > Therefore, we replace mtk_reset_ops with reset_simple_ops.
> > In addition, we also rename mtk_register_reset_controller to
> > mtk_register_reset_controller_simple.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> 
> Hello Rex,
> have you tested this? It won't work.
> 
> reset-simple is not using regmap, and it requires you to pass a
> struct
> reset_simple_data through drvdata.
> 
> Besides, I like that we are using regmap, while reset_simple simply
> uses
> readl/writel... so if you want to use that driver, which is good to
> reduce
> duplication, you should also implement support for regmap in the form
> of
> reset_simple_regmap_ops.
> 
> Regards,
> Angelo

Hello Angelo,

Yes, I also notice the error..
The data we used is not reset_simple_data.
I will drop using reset_simple_ops and remain original functions in
next version.

BRs,
Rex