linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 10/24] media: h264: Sort p/b reflist using frame

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <101c5840-37c7-1625-9856-2f6b5870b943@xs4all.nl>
Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:29:36 +0200
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
To:     Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc:     kernel@...labora.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/24] media: h264: Sort p/b reflist using frame_num

On 05/04/2022 22:44, Nicolas Dufresne wrote:
> In the reference list builder, frame_num refers to FrameNumWrap
> in the spec, which is the same as the pic_num for frame decoding.
> The same applies for long_term_pic_num and long_term_frame_idx.
> 
> Sort all type of references by frame_num so the sort can be reused
> for fields reflist were the sorting is done using frame_num instead.
> In short, pic_num is never actually used for building reference
> lists.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas.dufresne@...labora.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Fricke <sebastian.fricke@...labora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
>  include/media/v4l2-h264.h           |  2 --
>  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c
> index bcf9b7774560..7e1eba03099a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-h264.c
> @@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ v4l2_h264_init_reflist_builder(struct v4l2_h264_reflist_builder *b,
>  		if (!(dpb[i].flags & V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_ACTIVE))
>  			continue;
>  
> -		b->refs[i].pic_num = dpb[i].pic_num;
>  		if (dpb[i].flags & V4L2_H264_DPB_ENTRY_FLAG_LONG_TERM)
>  			b->refs[i].longterm = true;
>  
> @@ -139,15 +138,19 @@ static int v4l2_h264_p_ref_list_cmp(const void *ptra, const void *ptrb,
>  	}
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Short term pics in descending pic num order, long term ones in
> -	 * ascending order.
> +	 * For frames, short term pics are in descending pic num order and long
> +	 * term ones in ascending order. For fields, the same direction is used
> +	 * but with frame_num (wrapped). For frames, the value of pic_num and
> +	 * frame_num are the same (see formula (8-28) and (8-29)). For this
> +	 * reason we can use frame_num only and share this funciton between

funciton -> function

Regards,

	Hans

> +	 * frames and fields reflist.
>  	 */
>  	if (!builder->refs[idxa].longterm)
>  		return builder->refs[idxb].frame_num <
>  		       builder->refs[idxa].frame_num ?
>  		       -1 : 1;
>  
> -	return builder->refs[idxa].pic_num < builder->refs[idxb].pic_num ?
> +	return builder->refs[idxa].frame_num < builder->refs[idxb].frame_num ?
>  	       -1 : 1;
>  }
>  
> @@ -173,10 +176,10 @@ static int v4l2_h264_b0_ref_list_cmp(const void *ptra, const void *ptrb,
>  			return 1;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Long term pics in ascending pic num order. */
> +	/* Long term pics in ascending frame num order. */
>  	if (builder->refs[idxa].longterm)
> -		return builder->refs[idxa].pic_num <
> -		       builder->refs[idxb].pic_num ?
> +		return builder->refs[idxa].frame_num <
> +		       builder->refs[idxb].frame_num ?
>  		       -1 : 1;
>  
>  	poca = v4l2_h264_get_poc(builder, ptra);
> @@ -218,10 +221,10 @@ static int v4l2_h264_b1_ref_list_cmp(const void *ptra, const void *ptrb,
>  			return 1;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Long term pics in ascending pic num order. */
> +	/* Long term pics in ascending frame num order. */
>  	if (builder->refs[idxa].longterm)
> -		return builder->refs[idxa].pic_num <
> -		       builder->refs[idxb].pic_num ?
> +		return builder->refs[idxa].frame_num <
> +		       builder->refs[idxb].frame_num ?
>  		       -1 : 1;
>  
>  	poca = v4l2_h264_get_poc(builder, ptra);
> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-h264.h b/include/media/v4l2-h264.h
> index 4cef717b3f18..0d9eaa956123 100644
> --- a/include/media/v4l2-h264.h
> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-h264.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
>   * @refs.top_field_order_cnt: top field order count
>   * @refs.bottom_field_order_cnt: bottom field order count
>   * @refs.frame_num: reference frame number
> - * @refs.pic_num: reference picture number
>   * @refs.longterm: set to true for a long term reference
>   * @refs: array of references
>   * @cur_pic_order_count: picture order count of the frame being decoded
> @@ -36,7 +35,6 @@ struct v4l2_h264_reflist_builder {
>  		s32 top_field_order_cnt;
>  		s32 bottom_field_order_cnt;
>  		int frame_num;
> -		u32 pic_num;
>  		u16 longterm : 1;
>  	} refs[V4L2_H264_NUM_DPB_ENTRIES];
>