linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 00/31] x86/sgx and selftests/sgx: Support SGX2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YmJx7E/1FFe0UTSP@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:14:20 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To:     "Dhanraj, Vijay" <vijay.dhanraj@...el.com>
Cc:     "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Lutomirski, Andy" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "shuah@...nel.org" <shuah@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Shanahan, Mark" <mark.shanahan@...el.com>,
        "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
        "Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@...el.com>,
        "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>,
        "Huang, Haitao" <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
        "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/31] x86/sgx and selftests/sgx: Support SGX2

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 11:46:57PM +0000, Dhanraj, Vijay wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I evaluated V4 patch changes with Gramine and ran into an issue when
> trying to set EPC page permission to PROT_NONE. It looks like with V3
> patch series a change was introduced which requires kernel to have at
> least R permission when calling RESTRICT IOCTL. This change was done
> under the assumption that EPCM requires at least R permission for
> EMODPE/EACCEPT to succeed. But when testing with V2 version, EACCEPT
> worked fine with page permission set to PROT_NONE. 
> 
> Thanks to @Shanahan, Mark for confirming that EPCM does not need to have
> R value to allow EACCEPT or EMODPE. Given this, can we please revert this
> change?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Vijay

Let's try to avoid top-posting and split the lines appropriately.

BR, Jarkko