[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmJ71apr/9MPtT7g@piliu.users.ipa.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:56:37 +0800
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] s390/irq: utilize RCU instead of irq_lock_sparse()
in show_msi_interrupt()
On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 01:42:59PM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 11:36:17AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> > Oops. You are right. What about using rcu_read_lock() directly?
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
> > index 3033f616e256..45393919fe61 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/irq.c
> > @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ static void show_msi_interrupt(struct seq_file *p, int irq)
> > unsigned long flags;
> > int cpu;
> >
> > - irq_lock_sparse();
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> > if (!desc)
> > goto out;
> > @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void show_msi_interrupt(struct seq_file *p, int irq)
> > seq_putc(p, '\n');
> > raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> > out:
> > - irq_unlock_sparse();
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
>
> That looks like it should work. Please resend and also add a reference
> to commit 74bdf7815dfb ("genirq: Speedup show_interrupts()") which
> explains why this works.
Thanks for your review. I will follow up with V2.
Regards,
Pingfan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists