[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2cd07faf-e903-e55b-85c1-ce7a823ddb8b@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 13:48:21 +0200
From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To: "Nancy.Lin" <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, wim@...ux-watchdog.org,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, linux@...ck-us.net
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
"jason-jh . lin" <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>,
Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
singo.chang@...iatek.com, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 11/21] drm/mediatek: add display merge start/stop API
for cmdq support
On 16/04/2022 04:07, Nancy.Lin wrote:
> Add merge start/stop API for cmdq support. The ovl_adaptor merges
> are configured with each drm plane update. Need to enable/disable
> merge with cmdq making sure all the settings taken effect in the
> same vblank.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_drv.h | 2 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_merge.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_drv.h
> index 53aa988dde3b..43a412525b75 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_drv.h
> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ void mtk_merge_stop(struct device *dev);
> void mtk_merge_advance_config(struct device *dev, unsigned int l_w, unsigned int r_w,
> unsigned int h, unsigned int vrefresh, unsigned int bpc,
> struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt);
> +void mtk_merge_start_cmdq(struct device *dev, struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt);
> +void mtk_merge_stop_cmdq(struct device *dev, struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt);
>
> void mtk_ovl_bgclr_in_on(struct device *dev);
> void mtk_ovl_bgclr_in_off(struct device *dev);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_merge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_merge.c
> index 40da0555416d..c0d9b43b2a66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_merge.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_merge.c
> @@ -67,17 +67,31 @@ struct mtk_disp_merge {
> };
>
> void mtk_merge_start(struct device *dev)
Probably not my call, but wouldn't it make sense to enhance mtk_merge_start to
pass 'struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt' directly instead of adding this 'adapter'?
In the end this is up to Chun-Kuang.
Regards,
Matthias
> +{
> + mtk_merge_start_cmdq(dev, NULL);
> +}
> +
> +void mtk_merge_stop(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct mtk_disp_merge *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> - writel(MERGE_EN, priv->regs + DISP_REG_MERGE_CTRL);
> + mtk_merge_stop_cmdq(dev, NULL);
> }
>
> -void mtk_merge_stop(struct device *dev)
> +void mtk_merge_start_cmdq(struct device *dev, struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt)
> +{
> + struct mtk_disp_merge *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, 1, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs,
> + DISP_REG_MERGE_CTRL);
> +}
> +
> +void mtk_merge_stop_cmdq(struct device *dev, struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt)
> {
> struct mtk_disp_merge *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> - writel(0x0, priv->regs + DISP_REG_MERGE_CTRL);
> + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, 0, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs,
> + DISP_REG_MERGE_CTRL);
> }
>
> static void mtk_merge_fifo_setting(struct mtk_disp_merge *priv,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists