linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] sync with original text Documentation/vm/page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0ce6944a-2328-90b1-a315-4a834bb8e367@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:35:13 +0900
From:   Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
To:     baihaowen@...zu.com
Cc:     alexs@...nel.org, corbet@....net, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, seakeel@...il.com,
        siyanteng01@...il.com, siyanteng@...ngson.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] sync with original text
 Documentation/vm/page_owner.rst

Hi,

On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 09:40:39 +0800,
baihaowen wrote:
> 在 4/21/22 8:26 PM, yanteng si 写道:
[...]
>> I'm not sure why, your different versions of the patch are in one
>> thread and they look like this inside
>> <https://lore.kernel.org/linux-doc/>：
>>
>> [PATCH V3] docs/zh_CN: sync with original text Documentation/vm/page_owner.rst
>>  2022-04-20 12:46 UTC  (22+ messages)
>>     ` [PATCH V4] "
>>             ` [PATCH V5] "
>>                   ` [PATCH V6] "
>>                     ` [PATCH V7] "
>>                       ` [PATCH V8] "
>>                           ` [PATCH 0/2] "
>>                             ` [PATCH 1/2] docs/zh_CN: "
>>                             ` [PATCH 2/2] doc/vm/page_owner.rst: Fix
>> table display confusion
> 
> I always reply mail using below method:
> 
>   git send-email \
>     --in-reply-to='CAEensMxtk8zJPAM-u7hvYkaNTBrVdmhKA7YzVsKmTw0TcOE=Pw@...l.gmail.com' \
>     --to=siyanteng01@...il.com \
>     --cc=alexs@...nel.org \
>     --cc=baihaowen@...zu.com \
>     --cc=corbet@....net \
>     --cc=linux-doc@...r.kernel.org \
>     --cc=linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org \
>     --cc=seakeel@...il.com \
>     --cc=siyanteng@...ngson.cn \
>     --subject='Re: [PATCH 0/2] sync with original text Documentation/vm/page_owner.rst' \
>     /path/to/YOUR_REPLY
> 
> link previous

You are not following the recommendation described in
Section "Explicit In-Reply-To headers" of
Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
(or "15) 明确回复邮件头(In-Reply-To)" in
Documentation/translations/zh_CN/process/submitting-patches.rst).

        Thanks, Akira